Georgia – Former President Donald Trump’s legal team is calling upon Georgia’s highest court to disqualify the district attorney involved in investigating Trump’s post-2020 election activities and to discard the special grand jury report linked to the inquiry.
This appeal comes at a time when Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is inching closer to seeking charges against Trump and his allies for their attempts to overturn his narrow election loss to Joe Biden in Georgia.
The focus of Willis’ investigation since early 2021 is to establish whether Trump and his supporters violated any laws following his election loss. She has proposed seeking charges from a grand jury next month. Lawyers for the former president have filed similar petitions in the Georgia Election Probe Prosecutor Supreme Court and Fulton County Superior Court against Willis and Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney, who supervised the special grand jury.
Trump’s legal team, composed of Drew Findling, Jennifer Little, and Marissa Goldberg, acknowledges that the filings are unconventional but argues that they are necessary given the time constraints. Trump’s lawyers stress that Willis intends to use the special grand jury report to seek an indictment within a matter of weeks or even days.
The attorneys argue that their client is stranded between the supervising judge’s “protracted passivity and the District Attorney’s looming indictment.” They believe that the only viable option left for the former president is to seek intervention from the Supreme Court.
The petitions are also seeking to prevent Willis and her office from continuing the prosecution. They want the report produced by the special grand jury to be discarded and to bar prosecutors from presenting any evidence gleaned from the panel’s investigation to a regular grand jury.
These filings came after a previous request in March by Trump’s lawyers for a different judge to hear their claims. Willis dismissed these arguments as being without merit. As of now, Judge McBurney has yet to decide on the requests.
Trump’s attorneys argue that the proceedings lack clarity regarding constitutional protections and there were conflicts of interest within the prosecutor’s office. They maintain that the process has been tainted and lacks legality and public respectability.
In a counter-argument, Willis argued that these claims failed to meet the “exacting standards” necessary for disqualifying a prosecutor and failed to demonstrate violations of due process rights or that the grand jury process was tainted or unconstitutional.
The developments, in this case, continue to stir political, legal, and public discourse as the nation waits to see what course the highest court in Georgia Election Probe Prosecutor will take. The court’s decision carries far-reaching consequences that could shape the future landscape of political and judicial processes concerning elections and post-election activities in the country.